Patrick Kypson vs Bernard Tomic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In the last six months, Kypson has a slight edge on second serve performance, winning 46.47% compared to Tomic's 46.37%.
• Return game analysis shows Tomic with a marginal advantage on both first and second serve returns, with 25.32% and 44.37%, respectively, whereas Kypson's percentages are 23.27% and 44.07%.
• Tomic has been more effective under pressure, saving 57.06% of breakpoints, compared to Kypson's 55.3%.
• In terms of match results over the past year, Kypson has been more successful, winning 63.16% of his matches, while Tomic won 56.76%.
• Kypson excels on clay with a 69% career win rate, while his weakest surface is grass at 33%. Tomic performs best on hard courts, winning 62%, and struggles on clay, managing only 42%.
• Both players have primarily competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, however, Kypson holds a higher win percentage at 67.35% compared to Tomic's 56.67%.
• Their head-to-head record favors Kypson, who has defeated Tomic in their only previous meeting without dropping a set.
• Although neither player has faced each other in a deciding set or tiebreak, overall Tomic has a better record in deciding sets at 59% compared to Kypson's 53%.
• When examining opponent quality over the last year, the average rank faced by Kypson was slightly higher (301.98) than those Tomic faced (296.88).
• Tomic has a superior breakpoint conversion rate recently at 32.21%, whereas Kypson's rate is lower at 24.11%.
• Despite Kypson's higher success rate in past meetings, Tomic shows strengths in areas like breakpoint conversion and performance under pressure.

Editorial Prediction (August 19, 2025, UTC):

As we look into the match between Kypson and Tomic, the data reflects a closely contested rivalry with subtle differences favoring both players in certain aspects. Kypson's historical win against Tomic and his higher overall match success in the past year suggests he has a competitive edge.

However, Tomic showcases notable strengths such as superior breakpoint conversion and a better record in deciding sets, which could prove crucial if the match becomes tightly contested.

Surface performance might not play a major role given the indoor hard surface of their previous encounter, which Kypson dominated, but it will be interesting to see if Tomic's better performance on hard courts can alter their head-to-head narrative.

Assessing all factors, including recent form and their former match outcome, Kypson appears slightly more favored to claim the upcoming match, although Tomic’s proficiency in certain key areas suggests it could be competitive.